<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bob Bly Is Wrong About Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/</link>
	<description>Sales, Marketing and Customer Service Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-46887</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/#comment-46887</guid>
		<description>As it was on my blog, one would assume that when you start a sentence with &quot; ... you were driven to get on to your &quot;, that you&#039;re referring to the blogger who wrote the post.

And you also used the word &quot;you&quot; several times.

In the blogosphere, when one is speaking to a commenter and not the blogger, one puts the commenters name out there and makes sure we know who they&#039;re referring to.

If you have a beef with Thom, he linked to his blog and his email is easy to find over there.

Have a great day and may life treat you well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it was on my blog, one would assume that when you start a sentence with &#8221; &#8230; you were driven to get on to your &#8220;, that you&#8217;re referring to the blogger who wrote the post.</p>
<p>And you also used the word &#8220;you&#8221; several times.</p>
<p>In the blogosphere, when one is speaking to a commenter and not the blogger, one puts the commenters name out there and makes sure we know who they&#8217;re referring to.</p>
<p>If you have a beef with Thom, he linked to his blog and his email is easy to find over there.</p>
<p>Have a great day and may life treat you well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Rentniap</title>
		<link>http://www.simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-46885</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Rentniap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/#comment-46885</guid>
		<description>Read my Post again please Mr.Sigers. Now though you had quite a respectable and humorous response to my post, I actually did not mention YOU once. I specifically quoted Mr.Singer. Thom Singer.

And yes, I am quite the bundle of joy to read. 

Happy Easter. and Happy Blogging</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read my Post again please Mr.Sigers. Now though you had quite a respectable and humorous response to my post, I actually did not mention YOU once. I specifically quoted Mr.Singer. Thom Singer.</p>
<p>And yes, I am quite the bundle of joy to read. </p>
<p>Happy Easter. and Happy Blogging</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-46884</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/#comment-46884</guid>
		<description>Well, well Mr. Rentniap,

Aren&#039;t we a bundle of joy to read.

The fact of the matter is I didn&#039;t senselessly blabber, I tried to warn people not to read a book about using blogs for marketing written by someone who&#039;s not involved enough to write about it with any credibility.

Kind of like your comment... no credibility because you don&#039;t link bavk to a blog that does anything to help educate a needy public, nor did your comment do anything but expose you as an unhappy chap from ... Yonkers ? EEEEWWWW !

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well Mr. Rentniap,</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t we a bundle of joy to read.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is I didn&#8217;t senselessly blabber, I tried to warn people not to read a book about using blogs for marketing written by someone who&#8217;s not involved enough to write about it with any credibility.</p>
<p>Kind of like your comment&#8230; no credibility because you don&#8217;t link bavk to a blog that does anything to help educate a needy public, nor did your comment do anything but expose you as an unhappy chap from &#8230; Yonkers ? EEEEWWWW !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Rentniap</title>
		<link>http://www.simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-46882</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Rentniap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/#comment-46882</guid>
		<description>In a recent post by Thom Singer on Monday, May 22nd, 2006 at  6:46 PM, Thom had a blabbering bit about how Mr.Bly wrote his article to attract attention. Well, to directly quote Mr. Singer &quot;I think he wrote this to get attention (like your post and these 24 comments on your blog alone).&quot;

...

And yet you were driven to get on to your computer and senselessly blabber about about how Mr.Bly was compelled to write for attention. And yet it seems, you took the time of day to respond. Dare i say, I think Mr.Bly has then succeeded in his task of getting your attention.

You also wrote &quot;I feel sorry for people who always have to take the contrary position on every topic.&quot;
In a sense, you should feel sorry for yourself don&#039;t you think. Your position is opposite that of Mr.Bly&#039;s, so you are just as much on the contrary position as he is.

Hmm... just a thought, but you obviously wrote that response just to get that same attention you criticized Mr.Bly for. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent post by Thom Singer on Monday, May 22nd, 2006 at  6:46 PM, Thom had a blabbering bit about how Mr.Bly wrote his article to attract attention. Well, to directly quote Mr. Singer &#8220;I think he wrote this to get attention (like your post and these 24 comments on your blog alone).&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>And yet you were driven to get on to your computer and senselessly blabber about about how Mr.Bly was compelled to write for attention. And yet it seems, you took the time of day to respond. Dare i say, I think Mr.Bly has then succeeded in his task of getting your attention.</p>
<p>You also wrote &#8220;I feel sorry for people who always have to take the contrary position on every topic.&#8221;<br />
In a sense, you should feel sorry for yourself don&#8217;t you think. Your position is opposite that of Mr.Bly&#8217;s, so you are just as much on the contrary position as he is.</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; just a thought, but you obviously wrote that response just to get that same attention you criticized Mr.Bly for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sigers</title>
		<link>http://www.simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-7157</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplenomics.com/bob-bly-is-wrong-about-blogs/#comment-7157</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob - When you respond with general info, instead of facing the accusations, you look stupid, dense, ignorant and old. But then again, you probably are.

The title says it all - this is about blogging and you know nothing of it.

You have no idea how the blogging medium works and if anyone pays you to write about it, they will have wasted their money.

Stick with what you know and stay out of the blogosphere.

When you misuse it, use it poorly and without regard to the unwritten rules, you look silly.

Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob &#8211; When you respond with general info, instead of facing the accusations, you look stupid, dense, ignorant and old. But then again, you probably are.</p>
<p>The title says it all &#8211; this is about blogging and you know nothing of it.</p>
<p>You have no idea how the blogging medium works and if anyone pays you to write about it, they will have wasted their money.</p>
<p>Stick with what you know and stay out of the blogosphere.</p>
<p>When you misuse it, use it poorly and without regard to the unwritten rules, you look silly.</p>
<p>Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
